My only problem with the book is that there was not enough of the science, and the stuff on spinoza seemed very slanted. it's not a criticism as such - the spinoza stuff was BOUND to be slanted by the content (and if i'd wanted more i science could read one of his blimmin proper textbooks couldn't i) but it felt like it might have been quite a 'whiggish' rewrite
actually now i think about it, i don't know if i would have kept it in the great turf out of stuff from a year or so ago :-(
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 02:12 pm (UTC)http://www.amazon.co.uk/Looking-Spinoza-Antonio-R-Damasio/dp/0099421836/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/203-7663829-2116719?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1194358022&sr=8-1
My only problem with the book is that there was not enough of the science, and the stuff on spinoza seemed very slanted. it's not a criticism as such - the spinoza stuff was BOUND to be slanted by the content (and if i'd wanted more i science could read one of his blimmin proper textbooks couldn't i) but it felt like it might have been quite a 'whiggish' rewrite
actually now i think about it, i don't know if i would have kept it in the great turf out of stuff from a year or so ago :-(