Sterling Clover's read it*, which I hypothesize is one of the reasons that he and I failed to significantly communicate on the Kuhn thread; he was coming at me with Fuller's Kuhn rather than Kuhn's Kuhn.

*Unless it was some other attempt to debunk Kuhn, but I think it was Fuller's; my guess is that you've got better things to do with your time; that, of course, is an uninformed guess, but not necessarily a ridiculous one.